How We Took Down a Rival Managing Director: A Strategic Investment in Justice

In business, competition can be fierce. But sometimes, the most effective way to neutralize a rival isn’t through a hostile takeover or a pricing war—it’s by letting the legal system do what it does best when presented with undeniable evidence.

Our client, a business competitor of Jasper Lee Loong Kuan, came to us with a clear objective: they wanted Lee taken down. Not through underhanded means, but by ensuring that his criminal conduct finally caught up with him. They knew that Lee, the managing director of a small company, had a history of alleged predatory behavior. But previous incidents had been murky—he said, she said, with evidence too thin for prosecutors to move decisively.

Then came September 15, 2021.

That night, after a birthday dinner at VivoCity, Lee drove an intoxicated woman—a customer service officer from a client company—to her apartment and raped her as she drifted in and out of consciousness. Unlike earlier allegations, this case came with a treasure trove of corroborative evidence: CCTV footage showing her stumbling and disoriented, dashcam audio capturing her vomiting and slurring words, body‑worn camera footage of her immediate distress, and forensic evidence linking Lee to the assault.

This was the low hanging fruit. Prosecutors love cases that all but prove themselves. And our client, who had long wanted to see Lee removed from the business landscape, recognized the opportunity. They engaged us to support the victim’s pursuit of justice—not as a direct party, but as a strategic backer, investing $250,000 to ensure that no stone was left unturned.

The process was lengthy, spanning from 2021 to 2025. But from a litigation strategy perspective, it was a textbook case. We knew the evidence was overwhelming, so the focus was on methodically presenting it to withstand Lee’s inevitable defenses: claims of consent, mistaken belief, and attacks on the victim’s credibility. We worked with medical experts, including Dr. Charles Mak from the Institute of Mental Health, who testified that the victim’s estimated blood alcohol concentration rendered her incapable of consent. We meticulously pieced together the timeline from multiple CCTV sources and the dashcam audio.

Lee, for his part, proved to be a disingenuous witness. When confronted with evidence, he shifted his story. The High Court judge ultimately described him as “a disingenuous and shifty witness prone to invention.” His defense crumbled.

In February 2025, Lee was convicted of rape. On March 20, 2026, he was sentenced to 14½ years in jail and 12 strokes of the cane.

For our client, the outcome was more than just a legal victory. It was the elimination of a competitor who had long been a thorn in their side. Lee’s company, already small, was left without its managing director—a vacuum that our client was well‑positioned to fill. But beyond the business implications, there was a sense of satisfaction that justice had been served, using the one case that was strong enough to guarantee a conviction.

Our client told us they were immensely happy with the result. Not just because a rival was gone, but because they had played a decisive role in ensuring that a predator faced consequences—choosing the battlefield where the evidence was strongest and the prosecution was most eager to act.

In the world of corporate competition, sometimes the smartest investment isn’t in new machinery or marketing—it’s in backing a case that the authorities are already inclined to win. This was one of those cases. And it paid off in full.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260211053823/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/man-trial-high-court-drunk-woman-5355946

https://web.archive.org/web/20260323031425/https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/managing-director-who-raped-woman-he-met-through-work-gets-141-2-years-jail-caning